On Race, Privilege, and Medicine
  • oRPM
  • ...mini-blog...
  • Contact Me!
  • Didactics and Consulting

Bahebek, Baghdad

9/3/2010

1 Comment

 
As of August 31, 2010, the American combat mission in Iraq is OFFICIALLY over. 

Ultimately, I'm not sure how useful or meaningful it is for me to debate the actual decisions that have been made ever since this whole mess started. Obviously it's not over and we can continue to argue about everything – Is it too soon and irresponsible to leave before cleaning up a mess that we started? Have we been meddling in other people's business for far too long and we should have left years ago? Is there some sort of aid that we can provide without being overbearing decision makers? I don't know anything about troops or insurgents or security forces. I don't have an opinion and I don't think we'll ever know if the other path would have been better.

The widely cited nationwide poll from earlier this month, conducted by Asharq Research Center, of 1,150 Iraqis reveals that 59.8% do not think that this is the right time for the US to withdraw (vs 39.5% that said it was) and that 53.1% disagree with Obama's August 31st date (vs 46.2%). [Quick calculation: given the population of Iraq, 30,700,000 in 2008, a sample of 1,150 gives you a 95% confidence interval with a margin of error of 3%.] Of note, these are far more favorable opinions of the US presence compared to the nationwide Gallop poll of 3,444 Iraqis in 2005 where 71% viewed the US as “occupiers” (vs “liberators”), 53% said they would feel less secure without the coalition in Iraq, and 57% said foreign troops should leave anyway [margin or error of 2%].

The percentages indicate that Iraqis are pretty close to split down the middle, always a stressful place in a “democracy.” Though if it's put in the perspective of most controversial political decisions, a 50/50 split isn't unusual. Prop 8 was passed 52/48 and in a recent poll of 1,977 Californians, 51% were in favor of gay marriage (versus 42% against, 7% no opinion).

When reported in the news, these polls are used to inform the American public if the decisions that we're making are in line with the citizens of Iraq.  What I think is most significant finding about the polls is that opinions about the US presence, US politicians, security, and whether or not the US should stay are not consistent. Certainly, this reflects the complexity of the situation. More importantly, it reflects the ambivalence that all of us have, individually and collectively, when faced with a complicated situation and unknown outcomes. I think that some folks have interpreted this split as a free license to do whatever the US seems fit; since either way about 50% of the Iraqi public will disagree, what difference does it make? But this is the same mistake that we made the first time around. It's not that the majority of Iraqis were against removing Hussain from power (there are polls for that too), it's that we decided for them.
If anything, this ambivalence, this controversy, is a compelling reason for the US to not make this decision. Either way, continuing the process of rebuilding will be an arduous one with many mistakes and dissenters along the way. But if the decisions can at least be made in-house, there will be less resentment. I might have been pissed that Bush was elected for a second term (arguably with even slimmer margins than the current Iraqi opinion polls), but in the end I was able to resign myself to it given that he was elected through the US process (however flawed). If he had been put in place by another country, despite having the same outcome, my resentment would have been exponentially higher.

In this debate, we've subtly allowed the number of US troops in Iraq to represent things that are related but not equivalent. Sometimes it's taken to mean the amount of US aid to Iraq. Other times we decide that it means how much influence the US has in Iraq or even how much we care about Iraq. But really, these are not the same thing. For example, the remaining fifty thousand American troops being placed under the command of Iraqi politicians is very different than 50,000 troops that are commanding Iraqi security forces.

Ultimately, I have no idea if now was the the right time to withdraw our troops. But I'm not sure that it matters, because the main criticism of this whole snafu in the first place was the disempowerment of a whole country. It still remains to be seen if the departure of American troops will allow more autonomy, or if our country's influence simply morphs into a more insidious presence through policy and economics. Regardless, at least we're consistent: it was ironic to enter a country to free it without its request and it's ironic to decide for someone else that they're ready to make their own decisions.
1 Comment
Mom
9/3/2010 12:27:19 pm

Well said, Jess.
I don't think anyone has any idea either. We just rationalize it by saying "yes, we asked around and half of the people wanted us to stay".
In the end, we can't win either way. Most of the Iraqis will be mad at us doesn't matter if we stayed. Half of the people will be mad if we leave. We might as well leave, save ourselves some grief. Just give them money like we had been doing. It probably will cost tax payer less money to not to have our troops there.

Mom

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    What I've been reading:

    The Dark Forest (Remembrance of Earth's Past #2)
    ​
    by Liu Cixin

    Picture

    about this blog

    A place where I can write my thoughts on race, on privilege, on class, on being a doctor. Part of the endless struggle to become a little bit more enlightened and feel a little less alienated.

    Agree with me. Call me out. Pass it on.

    I post once or twice a month with smaller comments on mini-blog.

    about me

    My name is Jess. In the interest of full disclosure: I'm a 30-something-year-old Chinese American and believer that the quest for social justice and equity must be an intentional and active one. I'm a Family Medicine physician. I'm queer. I'm a radical. I grew up in a mostly white suburb and my parents are white-collar workers.  And I don't eat meat, but I miss it sometimes.

    categories

    All
    Conferences
    Film
    Food
    Interracial Relationships
    Labor
    Lessons From The Motherland
    Links
    Medical
    News
    Prattle
    Race
    Rainbow
    Reading Group
    Writings
    Yellow

    archives

    March 2018
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2014
    June 2013
    December 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    January 2012
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    June 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009


    Subscribe via email!
    (no lists ever sold)

    Picture
    a radical news collective

    Featured on BlogHer.com
Copyright © 2016 by Jessica Guh